Our world is not the same as it was 20 years ago. The way that students today communicate,
think, and learn have all transformed as digital technology progressed. As a result of this transformation,
traditional education is no longer meeting the needs of these students. As Prensky (2001) points out, “Today’s
average college grads have spent less than 5,000 hours of their lives reading,
but over 10,000 hours playing video games (not to mention 20,000 hours watching
TV). Computer games, email, the Internet, cell phones and instant messaging are
integral parts of their lives” (p. 1).
As a future language arts teacher who is passionate about reading, these
statistics fill me with mixed emotions.
On one hand I am disappointed that reading is becoming less and less a
part of students’ lives, but on the other hand I can also understand how
growing up in a digital world changes how students’ spend their time. Prensky (2001) says, “…today‟s students think
and process information fundamentally differently from their predecessors”
(p. 1). Their predecessors are the ones
who didn’t grow up in the digital technological world. These people are often the ones who are
educating the digital natives.
I classify myself as a digital immigrant. My family did not have Internet access in our
home until I was in high school; we had a computer long before that, but not
Internet. I purchased my first cell
phone as a freshman at UGA when I was 18 years old. I began learning about the digital world as a
college undergrad ten years ago. Much
has changed even in ten years time. As a
homeschool teacher for two teenagers, I find it a struggle to keep them focused
and motivated when most of the assignments come straight from the textbooks. They are a prime example of how the traditional
education system is not reaching this generation of students who think
differently and learn differently. We
must find new methods to reach the students of today.
Prensky (2001) states, “Digital
Natives are used to receiving information really fast. They like to parallel
process and multi-task. They prefer their graphics before their text
rather than the opposite. They prefer random access (like hypertext). They
function best when networked. They thrive on instant gratification and frequent
rewards. They prefer games to “serious” work” (p. 2). If we are to become effective educators, we
must use new teaching methods that spark the attention of the digital natives
and cause them to become well-educated students. If this means that lessons will be turned
into educational games, more technology will be used, and perhaps incorporating
e-readers into the literature classes, I am in support of whatever it takes to
reach my future students and further their education. The question is…what exactly will it take to effectively
educate the digital natives?
After reading the Digital
Literacies articles, I began to understand more about incorporating digital
literacy in the classroom. O’Brien and
Scharber (2008) state, “A search on the term digital
literacies yields a range of results including digital media, new
technologies, new literacies, or New Literacy Studies (popularly
abbreviated to NLS); or things that digitally literate people produce (blogs,
wikis, podcasts); or activities that digitally literate people can engage in
such as digital storytelling, social networking, and webpage creation” (p.
66). This definition of digital
literacies assists me in the interpretation of digital literacy and how to
incorporate it into the classroom. The more
I find out about the world of the “Digital Natives”, the more I will be able to
reach them in the classroom.
As Chase and Laufenberg (2011)
state, “This is to say, if digital literacy is simply reading and writing in a
digital environment, there is no need for the new terminology. Writing with a
pencil and writing with a pen are both writing” (p. 535). Digital literacy means incorporating new
technology as tools in the classroom that will enhance literacy education. I particularly liked the example of how the
Science Leadership Academy uses technology in creative ways to drive their “inquiry-based,
project-based public magnet school”. I
can see how their approach could be easily incorporated into other schools if there
is support from the school system.
I understand from
reading “Digital Literacies Go to
School: Potholes and Possibilities” that there are many “potholes” that make teaching
digital literacy in schools a struggle.
I still believe that if it is true that students today think
differently, process information differently, and learn differently than
generations of the past, why are we not changing the methods of teaching to
reach these new students? Our methods
and expectations of teaching must progress as we progress. This seems the only logical way to approach
teaching today.
Chase, Z., & Laufenberg, D.
(2011). Embracing the squishiness of digital
literacy. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54(7), 535-537. doi:
10.1598/JAAL.54.7.7
O'Brien, D., & Scharber, C.
(2008). Digital literacies go to school: Potholes
and possibilities. Journal of Adolescent &
Adult Literacy, 52(1), 66-68.
doi: 10.1598/JAAL.52.1.7
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital
natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5),
1-6.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital
natives, digital immigrants, part ii: Do they really
think differently? On the Horizon, 9(6), 1-9.